Windmill - so far, so good
There are some things that would be nice to improve with regards to Windmill. The most important thing is to make sure that launchpad.js can be bigger than 512 000 bytes:
It would also be nice to make the test output nicer. At the moment Windmill logs quite a lot to stderr, making it look like the test failed, even though it didn't. We don't want Windmill to log anything really, unless it's a critical failure:
I was going to say that we also have some problems related to logging in (because we look at a possibly stale page to decide whether the user is logged in), but it seems like Salgado already fixed it!
It would also be nice to investigate whether the problem with asserting a node directly after waiting for it sometimes fails. We had problems like that before; code was waiting for an element, and when using assertNode directly after the wait, the node still didn't exist. I haven't seen any test fail like that lately, so it might have been fixed somehow:
There are some other things I could think of that would be nice to have. I haven't found any bugs filed for them, but I'll list them here.
- Don't run the whole test suite under xvfb-run. It'd be better to start xvfb only for the Windmill tests.
- Use xvfb by default for Windmill tests. When running the Windmill tests it's quite annoying to have Firefox pop up now and then. It'd be better to run them headless by default.
- Switches for making debugging easier. Currently we shut down Firefox after running the Windmill tests. It should be possible to have Firefox remain running after the test has finished running, so that you can manually poke around if you want to. If we use xvfb by default, we also need a switch for not using it.